Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Nerman Fatic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
B. Van De Zandschulp vs N. Fatic

Botic Van De Zandschulp

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

C. Rank

214

Best Rank

191

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$3.7M

Career Money

$74.0K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Nerman Fatic

BIH

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

C. Rank

214

Best Rank

191

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$3.7M

Career Money

$74.0K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Fatic

They have played 2 sets in total, with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 2 and Nerman Fatic winning 0. The last match between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Nerman Fatic was at the M25 Prijedor, 11-05-2019, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-2 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Zandschulp	1
Fatic	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(SF) M25 Prijedor(05-11-19)

Stats

Botic Van De Zandschulp

Nerman Fatic

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs N. Fatic H2H Profile

B. V. D. Zandschulp	Stats	N. Fatic
$3,738,275	Career Prize Money	$73,995
60.83% (382-246)	Career Total W/L	58.47% (404-287)
1	Clay	0
7	Titles	12
1	Total H2H Matches	0
43.24% (16-21)	YTD Win/Loss	0.00% (0-1)

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs N. Fatic Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 45.24% of points on their second serve, while Nerman Fatic has won 44.65%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Botic Van De Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 46.17% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nerman Fatic has won 45.63%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.88% and 27.70% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Botic Van De Zandschulp has saved 55.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nerman Fatic has saved 52.80% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 46.77% of matches played (W/L 29/33), with Nerman Fatic winning 73.53% (W/L 50/18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Botic Van De Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 97/60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 12/15). Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
Player level: In the last year, Botic Van De Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 19/19), where as Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.10% of matches (W/L 25/14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 1 times and Nerman Fatic being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 2 and Nerman Fatic winning 0.
The last match between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Nerman Fatic was at the M25 Prijedor, 11-05-2019, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:38:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Botic Van De Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 142.58 while Nerman Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 331.76.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nerman Fatic has won 83% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Botic Van De Zandschulp has converted 30.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nerman Fatic has converted 31.14% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Nerman Fatic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs N. Fatic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

B. V. D. Zandschulp	Stats	N. Fatic
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	7
3	Aces (Total)	2
6	Total Double Faults	9
1:38:0	Average Match Time	1:38:0
58% (40/69)	1st Serve %	78% (53/68)
70% (28/40)	1st Serve Win %	49% (26/53)
28% (8/29)	2nd Serve Win %	20% (3/15)
58% (7/12)	Break Pts Won %	67% (4/6)
57% (39/68)	Return Points Win %	48% (33/69)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

B. V. D. Zandschulp Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Hellenic Championship - Athens - 03-11-2025
R1 Stan WawrinkaS. Wawrinka	L	2-6 7-6(5) 7-5	Stats
Rolex Paris Masters - Paris - 27-10-2025
Q3 Ethan QuinnE. Quinn	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
Q1 Jenson BrooksbyJ. Brooksby	W	4-6 6-3 6-3	Stats
Swiss Indoors Basel - Basel - 20-10-2025
R2 Reilly OpelkaR. Opelka	L	7-6(5) 6-7(7) 6-3	Stats
R1 Jiri LeheckaJ. Lehecka	W	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bergamo Challenger - 17-11-2025
R2 Federico ArnaboldiF. Arnaboldi	L	7-5 4-6 7-5	Stats
R1 Fabrizio AndaloroF. Andaloro	W	6-4 6-6 ret.	Stats
Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Calvin HemeryC. Hemery	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
M15 Bol - 20-10-2025
R2 Marko MiladinovicM. Miladinovic	L	7-6(2) ret.	Stats
R1 Antonio VoljavecA. Voljavec	W	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs N. Fatic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

B. V. D. Zandschulp	Stats	N. Fatic
60.83% (382/246)	YTD Win/Loss	58.47% (404/287)
57.84% (874/637)	Sets Win/Loss	57.49% (890/658)
52.97% (7595/6742)	Games Win/Loss	53.03% (7602/6734)
57.81% (74/54)	Hard Win/Loss	51.19% (43/41)
61.59% (178/111)	Clay Win/Loss	61.00% (341/218)
64.13% (118/66)	Indoor Hard W/L	43.48% (20/26)
44.44% (12/15)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
0.45	Aces Per Game	0.23
3139	Aces Total	1598
0.33	Double Faults Per Game	0.22
2297	Total Double Faults	1517
1:36:56	Average Match Time	1:20:1
393.07	Average Opponent Rank	509.29
62% (25788/41885)	1st Serve %	66% (23791/35820)
72% (18493/25788)	1st Serve Win %	65% (15579/23791)
48% (7758/16100)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (5772/12029)
43% (1881/4385)	Break Points Won % (Total)	47% (1969/4222)
40% (17540/43322)	Return Points Win %	43% (15618/36165)
58.93% (33/23)	Slam W/L	20.00% (1/4)
48.21% (27/29)	Masters W/L	0.00% (0/1)
60.00% (12/8)	Cups W/L	40.00% (4/6)
51.30% (79/75)	Main Tour W/L	25.00% (3/9)
63.33% (76/44)	Challenger W/L	52.89% (119/106)
69.82% (155/67)	Futures W/L	63.24% (277/161)
62% (354/572)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	60% (394/662)
49% (21/43)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/3)
53% (108/205)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	51% (79/156)
57% (117/206)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (102/189)
89% (359/319)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (394/348)
11% (359/39)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	11% (394/42)
23% (267/62)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (297/57)